Metallic Multi-material Additive Manufacturing (MMAM) is an emerging research topic, with potential applications
in heat exchangers, metamaterials and satellite components. In recent years, new multi-material laser
powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) techniques have been developed. However, processing challenges may arise, since
materials with dissimilar properties are mixed at the interfaces, which might lead to defects such as cracks. This
work aims to investigate the influence of different laser scan strategies to achieve sound interfaces with different
material mixing gradients. The samples, made of Inconel 718 and Invar were deposited by the patterning drums
technique and were analyzed by means of optical microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)
mappings and line scans. The orientation in which melt pools cross the material interface plays an important role
in mixing the materials. Different orientations in subsequent layers create a certain “jagged” pattern of mixing at
the interface. Sigmoid functions of Boltzmann fitted to the line scans show a significant slope steepness increase –
up to 75 % – in the element count from double scan to single scan, suggesting a stronger material mixing. The
double scan strategy leads to porosity at the interface and thus should be avoided. The remelt at the interface
partially healed defects such as cracks but does not seem to influence the mixing width at the interface. These
findings give general guidance for selecting scan strategies in MMAM depending on the desired mixing pattern at
the material interface.
«
Metallic Multi-material Additive Manufacturing (MMAM) is an emerging research topic, with potential applications
in heat exchangers, metamaterials and satellite components. In recent years, new multi-material laser
powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) techniques have been developed. However, processing challenges may arise, since
materials with dissimilar properties are mixed at the interfaces, which might lead to defects such as cracks. This
work aims to investigate the influence of different laser s...
»